← Back to search
RICKARD CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Doing business as RICKARD CONSULTING GROUP INC
CHESTERFIELD, MO, 63017
UnclaimedClaim this profile (free)
Small BusinessVOSB· Self-reported in SAM
Subcontracting experience
8 records from government sources. Past participation is not evidence of current teaming interest.
| Role | Agency | Description | Vehicle | Obligated | Action date | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | SUBCONTRACT LABOR; SUBCONTRACT TRAVEL & ODC 23S0330T Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 541715 Parent award performance state: CO Parent award description: BATTLESPACE VISUALIZATION RESEARCH (BVR) View parent award on USAspending | FA865020D6203USAspending | $116,541 | Aug 15, 2024 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | VS24 RCG PRE-AWARD AND LABOR 2400014661 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Navy Parent award NAICS: 541330 Parent award performance state: CA Parent award description: ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR) View parent award on USAspending | N0042119G0005USAspending | $465,004 | Jun 10, 2024 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | RF ELECT ASSY, SEPA 2300023223 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 811219 Parent award performance state: CA Parent award description: P5 CONTRACT TRAINING SYSTEM (P5CTS) CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SERVICES (CLS) TASK ORDER (TO) PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NELLIS NTTR FOR ACCESSING SPEAR SOFTWARE UNDER IDIQ CONTRACT View parent award on USAspending | FA821020D0003USAspending | $589,638 | Jun 22, 2023 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SURVEY THE IMPACT SIMULATION AS WELL AS OTHER PUBLICATIONS AND RESEARCH SIMULATIONS RELEVANT TO FUTURE MOMU/AGENT COLLABORATIVE TEAMING APPLICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT TECHNOLOGY SURVEYS TO IDENTIFY CANDIDATE OPERATOR STATION TECHNOLOGIES (E.G., CONTROLS, DISPLAYS, AND DECISION AIDS) THAT MAY BE LEVERAGED TO ENHANCE OPERATOR PERFORMANCE AND MISSION EFFECTIVENESS AND TO LIMIT OPERATOR WORKLOAD TO MANAGEABLE LEVELS FOR THE TARGETED MOMU/AGENT COLLABORATIVE TEAMING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF UVS AND MANNED CONTROL STATIONS PROJECTS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO COLLABORATIVE TEAMING INTERFACES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EVALUATE SCENARIOS AND MISSION TASKS USEFUL IN DEMONSTRATING THE ENVISIONED COLLABORATIVE TEAMING AND SERVE AS DESIGN AND EVALUATION TOOLS TO ASSESS COMPETING ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSESS CURRENT AND FUTURE ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES THAT WILL INFLUENCE THE COMMAND AND CONTROL OF UVS, SUCH AS DATALINKS, SENSORS, WEAPONS, AND VEHICLE FLIGHT/MISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, TO IDENTIFY THE APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS TO INFORM SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT.
4.2 COLLABORATIVE TEAMING REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT A REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS USING RELEVANT MISSION SCENARIOS TO DEFINE WORK AND FUNCTIONAL, INFORMATION, AND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHARACTERIZE THE MISSION(S) BY PROVIDING A DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND IDENTIFYING OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF MOMU/AGENT COLLABORATIVE TEAMING AND MISSION EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSIDER THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS CONTROLS, DISPLAYS, AND DECISION AID CONCEPTS ON INFORMATION AND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
4.3 COLLABORATIVE TEAMING INTERFACE CONCEPTS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP INTERFACE CONCEPTS FOR MOMU/AGENT ASSET COLLABORATIVE TEAMING IN COMPLETION OF MISSION SCENARIOS/TASKINGS. FOR THE HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATION EVALUATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE: 1) PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE OPERATOR STATION, 2) CONTROL AND DISPLAY DESIGN APPROACH, 3) DISPLAY FORMAT SYMBOLOGY AND ITS MECHANIZATION, 4) CONTROL FUNCTIONALITY AND ITS MECHANIZATION, 5) PROPOSED DECISION AIDING, AUTOMATION, AND/OR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS TO BE INCORPORATED, AND 6) ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES AND EMULATION REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFINE SIMULATOR HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS AND USE THOSE REQUIREMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND/OR REFINE THOSE COMPONENTS IN THE CURRENT IMPACT SIMULATION AND SUPPORTING FUSION ARCHITECTURE FOR THE GROUND STATIONS AND TEST OPERATORS€„¢ CONSOLE TO BE USED IN EVALUATIONS.
4.4 ANALYSIS PLANS FOR SIMULATION EVALUATION
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP ANALYSIS PLANS FOR SIMULATION EVALUATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PRIOR RELATED RESEARCH AND DESCRIBE A PROPOSED METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING THE INTUITIVENESS, OPERABILITY, USABILITY, AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS, DISPLAYS, AND DECISION AIDS IN SIMULATED MISSION CONTEXTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFINE TEST OBJECTIVES, SIMULATION CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS, TEST ENVIRONMENT/SCENARIO, EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN, TEST PARTICIPANT REQUIREMENTS, TEST MATRIX, TRAINING PROCEDURES, MEASURES TO BE RECORDED (E.G., PERFORMANCE, MISSION EFFECTIVENESS, WORKLOAD, SITUATION AWARENESS, TRUST JUDGEMENT/ACTION, AND OPERATOR-AGENT TEAMING EFFICIENCY), AND DATA REDUCTION AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES. THE CONTRACTOR€„¢S REVIEW SHALL INCLUDE MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR THE TEST APPROVAL PROCESSES, INCLUDING INSTITUTIONAL, SAFETY, AND TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARDS.
4.5 ARCHITECTURE AND SYSTEMS DESIGNS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE DESIGNS THAT INTEGRATE INTERFACES AND NETWORK PROTOCOLS INTO ADVANCED OPERATOR STATION CONCEPTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DESIGNS AND CONCEPTUAL HARDWARE CONFIGURATIONS UTILIZING SPECIALIZED CREW SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LABORATORY (CSIL) SIMULATION HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT TO MEET TEST PROGRAM OBJECTIVES.
4.6 SIMULATION EVALUATION FPH14-S015/241712 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 541715 Parent award performance state: VA Parent award description: COLLABORATIVE AGENT-AIDED TEAMING FOR MULTIPLE OPERATORS OF MULTIPLE UNMANNED VEHICLES View parent award on USAspending | FA865020D6207USAspending | $208,130 | May 19, 2023 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | SERVICE ITEM 4105004622 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 541715 Parent award performance state: NJ Parent award description: SUPERVISED PREFERENCE-BASED LEARNING USING ACTIVE SCENARIO View parent award on USAspending | — | $41,561 | Jun 21, 2022 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | SERVICE ITEM 4105004622 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 541715 Parent award performance state: NJ Parent award description: SUPERVISED PREFERENCE-BASED LEARNING USING ACTIVE SCENARIO View parent award on USAspending | — | $2,500 | May 10, 2022 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | SERVICE ITEM 4105004622 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 541715 Parent award performance state: NJ Parent award description: SUPERVISED PREFERENCE-BASED LEARNING USING ACTIVE SCENARIO View parent award on USAspending | — | $15,000 | Apr 12, 2022 | — – — |
| Subcontractor | Department of Defense | SERVICE ITEM 4105004622 Parent award context Parent award agency: Department of Defense · Department of the Air Force Parent award NAICS: 541715 Parent award performance state: NJ Parent award description: SUPERVISED PREFERENCE-BASED LEARNING USING ACTIVE SCENARIO View parent award on USAspending | — | $20,000 | Mar 8, 2022 | — – — |
Contract vehicles are shown only when present in the source record. Linked award numbers and vehicles open the authoritative record on USAspending.gov.
Government-sourced data comes from SAM.gov, SBA and USAspending.gov and is attributed to its source. Items marked company-reported were provided by the company and are verified by FedSub only where labeled. FedSub is a private company and is not affiliated with SBA, GSA/SAM.gov, or any government agency.